What is income tax?·
- It is a tax levied on both earned income (wages, salaries, commission) and unearned income (dividends, interest, rents).
Why should income tax be abolished?
- No income tax means more spending, more
demand, more production and more jobs. In short, in a faster growing
economy income tax leads
to tax evasion
as people don't
declare their true income.
If there is no income tax there will be no need to evade tax!
- No income tax will mean a greater
incentive to work, after all, a large chunk of our salary or business
profits’ goes towards payment of taxes plus the utilization of our taxes
is largely shrouded in mystery.
- Certain habits can be curbed through
elective use of the indirect tax weapon, such as very high taxes on fuel
guzzling imported cars. Don't we all crave a greener world?
- The cost of collecting income tax is
higher (more than 0.65% of the revenue collected), than the cost of
indirect tax collection.
Income tax is progressive, Indirect tax is
regressive –
- The rich pay more and in turn this money
is used to benefit the society, including the weaker sections of society.
- If income tax is abolished (both
individuals and corporates), the indirect tax machinery will need to work
overtime and the tax rates would need to be higher.
- The
biggest criticism in
relation to an
indirect tax regime
is that it
is regressive in
nature. You buy, you pay!(i.e.
it is same for both rich and poor). On the other hand, sin products like
tobacco and imported wines has heavy indirect tax levies. On abolition of
income tax, hiking rates on essentials to meet the collections would badly
hit the Aam aadmi.
- Yet the above measures are not easy to
introduce or to implement. Further, even if implemented, it would take
time for the new mechanism to fill in the entire gap which total abolition
of direct taxes would result in. For example, what extent can tax rates be
hiked for luxury items and niche luxury items?
- However, steep rates on niche luxury items
would further shrink the population which consumes these products,
resulting in the tax collection estimate from this mechanism not being
met. To bridge the ever widening tax collection gap, there would be a
trickle-down, with the tax rates on even essentials rising.
- In India, if there is an immediate and complete abolition of income tax, we are likely to see rising prices and a huge dent in consumer and investor confidence. It is true that the ills of black money would be abolished if income tax were abolished, but one cannot throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Perhaps, the regressive nature of indirect taxes can be diluted by –
- Identifying and imposing a higher tax on
luxury items and an even higher tax on niche luxury items.
- Introducing a supplementary tax on some goods,
such as an imported car or an
indigenously manufactured luxury car, taxing a proportion of spends
on big fat weddings etc.,
- Bringing in real estate within the ambit
of indirect tax in a more meaningful manner, such as progressive mechanism
of stamp duties (say purchase of large mansions, second homes etc., being
subject to a higher percentage of duties).
- Introducing estate duties - Countries such
as Belgium, Germany and Switzerland have steep estate duties. In Belgium's
capital Brussels the rate can be as high as 80% if the inheritance is not
from direct/indirect ascendants or descendants.
Can India afford to do away with income tax? Is
there any alternative?
- It might sound surprising, but there are
countries where you do not need to pay income tax (UAE, Qatar, Oman,
Kuwait, Cayman Islands, Bahrain, Bermuda, The Bahamas, Saudi Arabia,
Brunei Darussalam).
- Some of these countries are well known tax
havens, while most others have managed to use natural resources to fund
government expenses. Can India
afford to do away with income taxes?
- Clearly, there are legal and
constitutional issues involved, as sales and excise taxes on some products
are in the domain of state governments. And administration of the new
regime would require a huge overall change in the existing system, most
importantly the banking system.
- Alternate for
income tax – Expenditure
Tax.
- The direct taxation from personal
expenditures for consumption is one of the oldest yet least tried ideas in
the history of taxation.
- It has both merits and demerits and
deserves a serious thinking, what with the given state of the economy,
stubborn inflation and savings rates having fallen significantly in recent
years in India.
Expenditure tax –
- The consumption tax, sometimes referred to
as 'spending tax' or 'expenditure tax’, is quite like the income tax, with
one key difference being that the tax base is expenditure, not income.
- The best way to arrive at a person's
spending power vis-αΊ-vis his needs is to look at his day-to-day living
expenses. Income tax is an inferior measure of taxable capacity because it
does not encompass spending power in other forms and takes no account of
differences among individuals as to the need to save.
- One major argument put forward against the
expenditure tax is that by taking away savings from the tax base, one
tends to favour the rich, as they are in a better position to save larger
portions of their incomes. This would render the proposition
'inequitable'. It may also lead to greater concentration of wealth in the
hands of few. So the rates of an expenditure tax can be made steeply
progressive in order to tax the rich heavily.
- Another criticism of the consumption base
is that it would favour the miser (hoarder) over the spendthrift
(spender).
- It is argued that only by spending, and
not by earning and saving, the individual impose a burden on the rest of
the community. In other words, personal consumption drains the resources
available to the community for investment and public uses while work and
saving add to these resources.
- One generally accepted merit of this tax
is that it would be highly effective as an anti-inflationary tool. On the
other hand, the tax lacks the automatic stabilizing effect of the income
tax in periods of recession.
Current facts on income tax in India –
- In contemporary India, income tax is
largely a tax on the middle class salary earner. The poor hardly pays any
income tax. The rich have dividends and capital gains as large part of
their source of income rather than salaries.
- 99 per cent of India's tax paying people
are being coerced into filing their tax-returns, while they pay miniscule amounts
as tax on some pretext or other. The guys who pay up are mostly the
salaried class, because they can't evade it, as it gets deducted as TDS.
Case for replacing Income tax by a 'consumption
tax' like BTT (Banking Transaction Tax) –
- Why should only a particular class be
forced to pay taxes? It would render great political mileage to the
political parties supporting/proposing such a change. People would be
enchanted by a proposal that reduces their net tax liabilities from
existing 10-20 per cent to a mere 2 per cent!
- But then how would the government make up
for the loss in tax –revenue? If it were to scrap income taxes.
- As per 2013-14 Union Budget, personal
income tax has been budgeted at Rs.2,47,639
Crore for the current fiscal year.
- The total gross tax revenue of the govt. (including the state's share) stands at about Rs.12.4 lakh Crore (budgeted) in the current fiscal. A two per cent Banking Transaction Tax on current banking transaction can potentially generate about Rs.15 lakh Crore - more than compensating for the loss.
- The rich and business men have to show their total income, as everything is coming under bank account as there will not be any currency notes (papers). So they will pay more tax than today.·
- This will encourage the people to do more bank transactions and will gradually finish the black money.
Does this create other tax burdens that businesses face?
ReplyDeleteGood writer! Thanks a lot for getting here and posting so well posts. Here is anyone who appreciate it and state thank you! silk bank credit card | faysal bank credit card
ReplyDelete